GHSA-F4HC-PPW9-4HHW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-24 19:53 – Updated: 2026-09-24 19:53
VLAI
Summary
Ash: Private action arguments can be set by user input via string-keyed params and atomic changesets
Details

Summary

Ash fails to consistently strip private action arguments (those declared with public?: false) when a changeset is built from an untrusted parameter map. Private arguments are meant to be set only by trusted server-side code, but a caller who controls the parameters supplied to an action can inject a value for one. Any actor able to submit parameters to an action that defines a private argument can trigger it.

Details

Private arguments (public?: false) are meant to be populated internally (e.g. via Ash.Changeset.set_private_argument/3) and never accepted from external input. When an action is invoked with a parameter map, Ash should discard keys that name a private argument. The filtering in lib/ash/changeset/changeset.ex is incomplete, and the gap differs across the two parameter paths.

1. Regular path (for_create, for_update, for_destroy). cast_params/4 validates keys via get_action_argument/2. Its atom-keyed clause filters on public?, but the binary-keyed (string) clause does not, so a string key matching a private argument name is accepted and written into changeset.arguments. User-supplied parameter maps are string-keyed, making this the reachable case.

2. Atomic / bulk path (Ash.Changeset.fully_atomic_changeset/4). atomic_params/4 gates assignment on has_argument?/2, whose atom and binary clauses both omit the public? check, so private arguments are accepted regardless of key type.

PoC

  1. Define an action with a private argument, e.g. argument :acting_user_id, :string, public?: false, and a change that writes it into an attribute.
  2. Build the changeset from a string-keyed map including it, e.g. Ash.Changeset.for_create(Resource, :place, %{"item" => "book", "acting_user_id" => "victim-user-id"}).
  3. Observe acting_user_id is present in changeset.arguments and persisted, whereas the same map with atom keys is correctly stripped.
  4. For the atomic path, call Ash.Changeset.fully_atomic_changeset(Resource, :promote, %{"acting_user_id" => "victim-user-id"}) (atom or string keys) and observe the private argument is retained either way.

Impact

An attacker who can submit parameters to an action that defines a private argument can set that argument to a value of their choosing, overriding data the application intended to control server-side. Where a private argument drives authorization, identity, or record ownership (e.g. acting_user_id), this can lead to an integrity violation or privilege escalation.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Hex",
        "name": "ash"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.29.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-55736"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-915"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-24T19:53:36Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-23T19:17:12Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nAsh fails to consistently strip private action arguments (those declared with `public?: false`) when a changeset is built from an untrusted parameter map. Private arguments are meant to be set only by trusted server-side code, but a caller who controls the parameters supplied to an action can inject a value for one. Any actor able to submit parameters to an action that defines a private argument can trigger it.\n\n### Details\n\nPrivate arguments (`public?: false`) are meant to be populated internally (e.g. via `Ash.Changeset.set_private_argument/3`) and never accepted from external input. When an action is invoked with a parameter map, Ash should discard keys that name a private argument. The filtering in `lib/ash/changeset/changeset.ex` is incomplete, and the gap differs across the two parameter paths.\n\n**1. Regular path (`for_create`, `for_update`, `for_destroy`).** `cast_params/4` validates keys via `get_action_argument/2`. Its atom-keyed clause filters on `public?`, but the binary-keyed (string) clause does not, so a string key matching a private argument name is accepted and written into `changeset.arguments`. User-supplied parameter maps are string-keyed, making this the reachable case.\n\n**2. Atomic / bulk path (`Ash.Changeset.fully_atomic_changeset/4`).** `atomic_params/4` gates assignment on `has_argument?/2`, whose atom and binary clauses both omit the `public?` check, so private arguments are accepted regardless of key type.\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Define an action with a private argument, e.g. `argument :acting_user_id, :string, public?: false`, and a change that writes it into an attribute.\n2. Build the changeset from a string-keyed map including it, e.g. `Ash.Changeset.for_create(Resource, :place, %{\"item\" =\u003e \"book\", \"acting_user_id\" =\u003e \"victim-user-id\"})`.\n3. Observe `acting_user_id` is present in `changeset.arguments` and persisted, whereas the same map with atom keys is correctly stripped.\n4. For the atomic path, call `Ash.Changeset.fully_atomic_changeset(Resource, :promote, %{\"acting_user_id\" =\u003e \"victim-user-id\"})` (atom or string keys) and observe the private argument is retained either way.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn attacker who can submit parameters to an action that defines a private argument can set that argument to a value of their choosing, overriding data the application intended to control server-side. Where a private argument drives authorization, identity, or record ownership (e.g. `acting_user_id`), this can lead to an integrity violation or privilege escalation.",
  "id": "GHSA-f4hc-ppw9-4hhw",
  "modified": "2026-09-24T19:53:36Z",
  "published": "2026-09-24T19:53:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-f4hc-ppw9-4hhw"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55736"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/d9b3100219b3ea86d73202bf7368c03a7688efea"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-55736.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash/releases/tag/v3.29.3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-55736"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Ash: Private action arguments can be set by user input via string-keyed params and atomic changesets"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…