ghsa-f4pv-q5f7-2h55
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-06 21:30
Modified
2024-07-22 18:31
Details

nscd: netgroup cache assumes NSS callback uses in-buffer strings

The Name Service Cache Daemon's (nscd) netgroup cache can corrupt memory when the NSS callback does not store all strings in the provided buffer. The flaw was introduced in glibc 2.15 when the cache was added to nscd.

This vulnerability is only present in the nscd binary.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-33602"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-466"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-06T20:15:11Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "nscd: netgroup cache assumes NSS callback uses in-buffer strings\n\nThe Name Service Cache Daemon\u0027s (nscd) netgroup cache can corrupt memory\nwhen the NSS callback does not store all strings in the provided buffer.\nThe flaw was introduced in glibc 2.15 when the cache was added to nscd.\n\nThis vulnerability is only present in the nscd binary.\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-f4pv-q5f7-2h55",
  "modified": "2024-07-22T18:31:47Z",
  "published": "2024-05-06T21:30:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-33602"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00026.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240524-0012"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=advisories/GLIBC-SA-2024-0008"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/22/5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.