GHSA-F643-8M38-XC64

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-30 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-30 18:30
VLAI?
Details

A divide-by-zero in the encryption/decryption routines of GNU Recutils v1.9 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via inputting an empty value as a password.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-65409"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-30T18:15:47Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "A divide-by-zero in the encryption/decryption routines of GNU Recutils v1.9 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via inputting an empty value as a password.",
  "id": "GHSA-f643-8m38-xc64",
  "modified": "2025-12-30T18:30:20Z",
  "published": "2025-12-30T18:30:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-65409"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MAXEUR5/Vulnerability_Disclosures/blob/main/2025/CVE-2025-65409.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-recutils/2025-10/msg00004.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.gnu.org/software/recutils"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/recutils"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…