GHSA-F6G8-8P5J-HPHV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:28 – Updated: 2025-04-09 03:32
VLAI?
Details
SSH Tectia Client/Server/Connector 5.1.0 and earlier, Manager 2.2.0 and earlier, and other products, when using an RSA key with exponent 3, removes PKCS-1 padding before generating a hash, which allows remote attackers to forge a PKCS #1 v1.5 signature that is signed by that RSA key and prevents Tectia from correctly verifying X.509 and other certificates that use PKCS #1, a similar issue to CVE-2006-4339.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-5484"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-10-24T22:07:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "SSH Tectia Client/Server/Connector 5.1.0 and earlier, Manager 2.2.0 and earlier, and other products, when using an RSA key with exponent 3, removes PKCS-1 padding before generating a hash, which allows remote attackers to forge a PKCS #1 v1.5 signature that is signed by that RSA key and prevents Tectia from correctly verifying X.509 and other certificates that use PKCS #1, a similar issue to CVE-2006-4339.",
"id": "GHSA-f6g8-8p5j-hphv",
"modified": "2025-04-09T03:32:38Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:28:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-5484"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22350"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1017060"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1017061"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/845620"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ssh.com/company/news/2006/english/security/article/786"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/4032"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…