ghsa-f7x9-6qwf-8m25
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:11
Modified
2022-05-14 02:11
Severity ?
Details
The Int.Exp Montgomery code in the math/big library in Go 1.5.x before 1.5.3 mishandles carry propagation and produces incorrect output, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain private RSA keys via unspecified vectors.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-8618" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-01-27T20:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The Int.Exp Montgomery code in the math/big library in Go 1.5.x before 1.5.3 mishandles carry propagation and produces incorrect output, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain private RSA keys via unspecified vectors.", "id": "GHSA-f7x9-6qwf-8m25", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:11:48Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:11:48Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8618" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/golang/go/issues/13515" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/17672" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-announce/MEATuOi_ei4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/175642.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/176179.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-05/msg00077.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/21/6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/22/9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/13/7" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.