GHSA-F88V-743W-MGC8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:51 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:51
VLAI?
Details

The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-4321"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-08-20T10:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724.",
  "id": "GHSA-f88v-743w-mgc8",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T00:51:26Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:51:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4321"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…