ghsa-fc6q-rxqx-rpp6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 00:00
Modified
2022-05-02 00:00
Details

WinZip before 11.0 does not properly verify the authenticity of updates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse update, as demonstrated by evilgrade and DNS cache poisoning.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2008-3442",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-94",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2008-08-01T14:41:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "WinZip before 11.0 does not properly verify the authenticity of updates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse update, as demonstrated by evilgrade and DNS cache poisoning.",
   id: "GHSA-fc6q-rxqx-rpp6",
   modified: "2022-05-02T00:00:11Z",
   published: "2022-05-02T00:00:11Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3442",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2008-07/0250.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://securitytracker.com/id?1020581",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.infobyte.com.ar/down/Francisco%20Amato%20-%20evilgrade%20-%20ENG.pdf",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.infobyte.com.ar/down/isr-evilgrade-1.0.0.tar.gz",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.