ghsa-fcm2-6c3h-pg6j
Vulnerability from github
Description
An ExecSync request runs a command in a container and returns the output to the Kubelet. It is used for readiness and liveness probes within a pod. The way CRI-O runs ExecSync commands is through conmon. CRI-O asks conmon to start the process, and conmon writes the output to disk. CRI-O then reads the output and returns it to the Kubelet.
If the output of the command is large enough, it is possible to exhaust the memory (or disk usage) of the node. The following deployment is an example yaml file that will output around 8GB of ‘A’ characters, which would be written to disk by conmon and read by CRI-O.
yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nginx-deployment100
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nginx
replicas: 2
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx:1.14.2
lifecycle:
postStart:
exec:
command: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "seq 1 50000000`; do echo -n 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'; done"]
Impact
It is possible for the node to be exhausted of memory or disk space, depending on the node the command is being run on. What is further problematic is that the memory and disk usage aren't attributed to the container, as this file and its processing are implementation details of CRI-O. The consequence of the exhaustion is that other services on the node, e.g. other containers, will be unable to allocate memory and thus causing a denial of service.
Patches
This vulnerability will be fixed in 1.24.1, 1.23.3, 1.22.5, v1.21.8, v1.20.8, v1.19.7
Workarounds
At the time of writing, no workaround exists other than ensuring only trusted images are used.
References
https://github.com/containerd/containerd/security/advisories/GHSA-5ffw-gxpp-mxpf
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in the CRI-O repo * To make a report, email your vulnerability to the private cncf-crio-security@lists.cncf.io list with the security details and the details expected for all CRI-O bug reports.
Credits
Disclosed by Ada Logics in a security audit sponsored by CNCF and facilitated by OSTIF.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Go", "name": "github.com/cri-o/cri-o" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "1.24.0" }, { "fixed": "1.24.1" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "1.24.0" ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Go", "name": "github.com/cri-o/cri-o" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "1.23.0" }, { "fixed": "1.23.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Go", "name": "github.com/cri-o/cri-o" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.22.5" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-1708" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-400", "CWE-770" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2022-06-06T21:50:21Z", "nvd_published_at": "2022-06-07T18:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "### Description\nAn ExecSync request runs a command in a container and returns the output to the Kubelet. It is used for readiness and liveness probes within a pod. The way CRI-O runs ExecSync commands is through conmon. CRI-O asks conmon to start the process, and conmon writes the output to disk. CRI-O then reads the output and returns it to the Kubelet.\n\nIf the output of the command is large enough, it is possible to exhaust the memory (or disk usage) of the node. The following deployment is an example yaml file that will output around 8GB of \u2018A\u2019 characters, which would be written to disk by conmon and read by CRI-O.\n\n```yaml\napiVersion: apps/v1\nkind: Deployment\nmetadata:\n name: nginx-deployment100\nspec:\n selector:\n matchLabels:\n app: nginx\n replicas: 2\n template:\n metadata:\n labels:\n app: nginx\n spec:\n containers:\n - name: nginx\n image: nginx:1.14.2\n lifecycle:\n postStart:\n exec:\n command: [\"/bin/sh\", \"-c\", \"seq 1 50000000`; do echo -n \u0027aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa\u0027; done\"]\n```\n\n### Impact\nIt is possible for the node to be exhausted of memory or disk space, depending on the node the command is being run on. What is further problematic is that the memory and disk usage aren\u0027t attributed to the container, as this file and its processing are implementation details of CRI-O. The consequence of the exhaustion is that other services on the node, e.g. other containers, will be unable to allocate memory and thus causing a denial of service.\n\n### Patches\nThis vulnerability will be fixed in 1.24.1, 1.23.3, 1.22.5, v1.21.8, v1.20.8, v1.19.7\n\n### Workarounds\nAt the time of writing, no workaround exists other than ensuring only trusted images are used.\n\n### References\nhttps://github.com/containerd/containerd/security/advisories/GHSA-5ffw-gxpp-mxpf\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [the CRI-O repo](http://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/issues)\n* To make a report, email your vulnerability to the private\n[cncf-crio-security@lists.cncf.io](mailto:cncf-crio-security@lists.cncf.io) list\nwith the security details and the details expected for [all CRI-O bug\nreports](https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml).\n\n### Credits\nDisclosed by Ada Logics in a security audit sponsored by CNCF and facilitated by OSTIF.\n", "id": "GHSA-fcm2-6c3h-pg6j", "modified": "2023-07-24T19:33:40Z", "published": "2022-06-06T21:50:21Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/security/advisories/GHSA-fcm2-6c3h-pg6j" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1708" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/commit/f032cf649ecc7e0c46718bd9e7814bfb317cb544" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085361" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Node DOS by way of memory exhaustion through ExecSync request in CRI-O" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.