ghsa-fg62-299p-x79j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:32
Modified
2022-05-13 01:32
Severity ?
Details
In stroke_socket.c in strongSwan before 5.6.3, a missing packet length check could allow a buffer underflow, which may lead to resource exhaustion and denial of service while reading from the socket.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-5388" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-124", "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-05-31T13:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In stroke_socket.c in strongSwan before 5.6.3, a missing packet length check could allow a buffer underflow, which may lead to resource exhaustion and denial of service while reading from the socket.", "id": "GHSA-fg62-299p-x79j", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:32:12Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:32:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5388" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.strongswan.org/?p=strongswan.git;a=commitdiff;h=0acd1ab4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-16" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3771-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4229" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00077.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00001.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00047.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/172833/strongSwan-VPN-Charon-Server-Buffer-Overflow.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/338343" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104263" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.