GHSA-FGCX-Q954-XG9C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:24 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:24
VLAI?
Details

Buffer overflow in (1) Call of Duty 1.5b and earlier, (2) Call of Duty United Offensive 1.51b and earlier, and (3) Call of Duty 2 1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long map argument to the "callvote map" command.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-5058"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-09-28T00:07:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in (1) Call of Duty 1.5b and earlier, (2) Call of Duty United Offensive 1.51b and earlier, and (3) Call of Duty 2 1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long map argument to the \"callvote map\" command.",
  "id": "GHSA-fgcx-q954-xg9c",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T07:24:33Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:24:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-5058"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/29129"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://aluigi.altervista.org/adv/codmapbof-adv.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22078"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20180"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…