GHSA-FHQC-6XWP-7X74

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-25 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/damon/ops-common: handle extreme intervals in damon_hot_score()

Fix three issues in damon_hot_score() that comes from wrong handling of extreme (zero or too high) monitoring intervals user setup.

When the user sets sampling interval zero, damon_max_nr_accesses(), which is called from damon_hot_score(), causes a divide-by-zero. Needless to say, it is a problem.

When the user sets the aggregation interval zero, the function returns zero. It is wrong, since the real maximum nr_acceses in the setup should be one. Worse yet, it can cause another divide-by-zero from its caller, damon_hot_score(), since it uses damon_max_nr_accesses() return value as a denominator.

When the user sets the aggregation interval very high, damon_hot_score() could return a value out of [0, DAMOS_MAX_SCORE] range. Since the return value is used as an index to the regions_score_histogram array, which is DAMOS_MAX_SCORE+1 size, it causes out of bounds array access.

The issues can be relatively easily reproduced like below. The sysfs write permission is required, though.

# ./damo start --damos_action lru_prio --damos_quota_space 100M \
        --damos_quota_interval 1s
# cd /sys/kernel/mm/damon/admin/kdamonds/0
# echo 0 > contexts/0/monitoring_attrs/intervals/sample_us
# echo 0 > contexts/0/monitoring_attrs/intervals/aggr_us
# echo commit > state
# dmesg
[...]
[  131.329762] Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[...]
[  131.336089] RIP: 0010:damon_hot_score+0x27/0xd0
[...]

Fix the divide-by-zero intervals problems by explicitly handling the zero intervals in damon_max_nr_accesses(). Fix the out-of-bound array access by applying [0, DAMOS_MAX_SCORE] bounds before returning from damon_hot_score().

The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64458"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:30Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/damon/ops-common: handle extreme intervals in damon_hot_score()\n\nFix three issues in damon_hot_score() that comes from wrong handling of\nextreme (zero or too high) monitoring intervals user setup.\n\nWhen the user sets sampling interval zero, damon_max_nr_accesses(), which\nis called from damon_hot_score(), causes a divide-by-zero.  Needless to\nsay, it is a problem.\n\nWhen the user sets the aggregation interval zero, the function returns\nzero.  It is wrong, since the real maximum nr_acceses in the setup should\nbe one.  Worse yet, it can cause another divide-by-zero from its caller,\ndamon_hot_score(), since it uses damon_max_nr_accesses() return value as a\ndenominator.\n\nWhen the user sets the aggregation interval very high, damon_hot_score()\ncould return a value out of [0, DAMOS_MAX_SCORE] range.  Since the return\nvalue is used as an index to the regions_score_histogram array, which is\nDAMOS_MAX_SCORE+1 size, it causes out of bounds array access.\n\nThe issues can be relatively easily reproduced like below.  The sysfs\nwrite permission is required, though.\n\n    # ./damo start --damos_action lru_prio --damos_quota_space 100M \\\n            --damos_quota_interval 1s\n    # cd /sys/kernel/mm/damon/admin/kdamonds/0\n    # echo 0 \u003e contexts/0/monitoring_attrs/intervals/sample_us\n    # echo 0 \u003e contexts/0/monitoring_attrs/intervals/aggr_us\n    # echo commit \u003e state\n    # dmesg\n    [...]\n    [  131.329762] Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\n    [...]\n    [  131.336089] RIP: 0010:damon_hot_score+0x27/0xd0\n    [...]\n\nFix the divide-by-zero intervals problems by explicitly handling the zero\nintervals in damon_max_nr_accesses().  Fix the out-of-bound array access\nby applying [0, DAMOS_MAX_SCORE] bounds before returning from\ndamon_hot_score().\n\nThe issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.",
  "id": "GHSA-fhqc-6xwp-7x74",
  "modified": "2026-07-25T12:31:36Z",
  "published": "2026-07-25T12:31:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64458"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35d4a3cf70a855b50e53189ac2f8463e20a02046"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58321b4e6e4f0f412069ab27ccdd56292757343a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/74fef68d521150281e36cdaa20e9e1ee3e3aa146"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76e415ea88d20f022ed5cfcf78c50e156a267e91"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c8f31eaae6140ecadec0c07320498a944556de2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef2ae10a4582bc92b7e944181bbd2f87f3d30f3a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…