GHSA-FMRQ-6VMH-QMMF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:45 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:45
VLAI?
Details
htpasswd, as used in Acme thttpd 2.25b and possibly other products such as Apache, might allow local users to gain privileges via shell metacharacters in a command line argument, which is used in a call to the system function. NOTE: since htpasswd is normally installed as a non-setuid program, and the exploit is through command line options, perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. However, if there are some typical or recommended configurations that use htpasswd with sudo privileges, or common products that access htpasswd remotely, then perhaps it should be included.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-1079"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-03-09T00:02:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "htpasswd, as used in Acme thttpd 2.25b and possibly other products such as Apache, might allow local users to gain privileges via shell metacharacters in a command line argument, which is used in a call to the system function. NOTE: since htpasswd is normally installed as a non-setuid program, and the exploit is through command line options, perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. However, if there are some typical or recommended configurations that use htpasswd with sudo privileges, or common products that access htpasswd remotely, then perhaps it should be included.",
"id": "GHSA-fmrq-6vmh-qmmf",
"modified": "2022-05-01T06:45:55Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:45:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1079"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25217"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=thttpd\u0026m=114153031201867\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=thttpd\u0026m=114154083000296\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175949/m-privacy-TightGate-Pro-Code-Execution-Insecure-Permissions.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Nov/13"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23828"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426823/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16972"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…