GHSA-FP9P-7HX8-XFP3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-07 15:32 – Updated: 2025-02-14 00:30
VLAI?
Details
A Cross-Protocol Scripting vulnerability is found in Apache Kvrocks.
Since Kvrocks didn't detect if "Host:" or "POST" appears in RESP requests, a valid HTTP request can also be sent to Kvrocks as a valid RESP request and trigger some database operations, which can be dangerous when it is chained with SSRF.
It is similiar to CVE-2016-10517 in Redis.
This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from the initial version to the latest version 2.11.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.11.1, which fixes the issue.
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-25069"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-115"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-07T13:15:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A Cross-Protocol Scripting vulnerability is found in Apache Kvrocks.\n\nSince Kvrocks didn\u0027t detect if \"Host:\" or \"POST\" appears in RESP requests,\na valid HTTP request can also be sent to Kvrocks as a valid RESP request \nand trigger some database operations, which can be\u00a0dangerous when \nit is chained with SSRF.\n\nIt is similiar to\u00a0CVE-2016-10517 in Redis.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from the initial version to the latest version 2.11.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.11.1, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-fp9p-7hx8-xfp3",
"modified": "2025-02-14T00:30:44Z",
"published": "2025-02-07T15:32:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25069"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/gbxv9gpsskmdzg6z48zm3tvo8cyo9v3t"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10517"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…