ghsa-fpgp-wp2g-292c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:26
Modified
2022-05-17 05:26
Details
The TAR file parser in Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, PC Tools AntiVirus 7.0.3.5, and Sophos Anti-Virus 4.61.0 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a POSIX TAR file with a \19\04\00\10 character sequence at a certain location. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-1424" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-03-21T10:11:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The TAR file parser in Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, PC Tools AntiVirus 7.0.3.5, and Sophos Anti-Virus 4.61.0 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a POSIX TAR file with a \\19\\04\\00\\10 character sequence at a certain location. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.", "id": "GHSA-fpgp-wp2g-292c", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:26:04Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:26:04Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1424" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/80390" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/80391" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/80392" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/80409" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2012/program.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/522005" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.