ghsa-fqw4-h3x7-w4c7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 06:17
Modified
2022-05-02 06:17
Details

Buffer overflow in qoslist in bos.net.tcp.server in IBM AIX 6.1 and VIOS 2.1 allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-0961"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-03-10T22:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in qoslist in bos.net.tcp.server in IBM AIX 6.1 and VIOS 2.1 allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-fqw4-h3x7-w4c7",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T06:17:37Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T06:17:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0961"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12051"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/qoslist_advisory.asc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1023694"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ68194"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ71554"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ71590"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ71869"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0556"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.