ghsa-fr35-62xv-r8c8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:20
Modified
2022-04-30 18:20
Details

The Remote Data Protocol (RDP) version 5.1 in Microsoft Windows XP allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) when Remote Desktop is enabled via a PDU Confirm Active data packet that does not set the Pattern BLT command, aka "Denial of Service in Remote Desktop."

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-0864"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-10-11T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Remote Data Protocol (RDP) version 5.1 in Microsoft Windows XP allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) when Remote Desktop is enabled via a PDU Confirm Active data packet that does not set the Pattern BLT command, aka \"Denial of Service in Remote Desktop.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-fr35-62xv-r8c8",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:20:05Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:20:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0864"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2002/ms02-051"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103235745116592\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103236181522253\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10120.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5713"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.