ghsa-fv2p-m5px-j64w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 17:52
Modified
2022-05-01 17:52
Details
Buffer overflow in kern/uipc_mbuf2.c in OpenBSD 3.9 and 4.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via fragmented IPv6 packets due to "incorrect mbuf handling for ICMP6 packets." NOTE: this was originally reported as a denial of service.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-1365" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-03-10T21:19:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in kern/uipc_mbuf2.c in OpenBSD 3.9 and 4.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via fragmented IPv6 packets due to \"incorrect mbuf handling for ICMP6 packets.\" NOTE: this was originally reported as a denial of service.", "id": "GHSA-fv2p-m5px-j64w", "modified": "2022-05-01T17:52:55Z", "published": "2022-05-01T17:52:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-1365" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs\u0026m=117252151023868\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24490" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1017735" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.coresecurity.com/?action=item\u0026id=1703" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/986425" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openbsd.org/errata39.html#m_dup1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openbsd.org/errata40.html#m_dup1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/33050" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22901" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017744" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.