ghsa-fv5v-25hp-gmw7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:13
Modified
2022-05-03 03:13
Details
serve_notify in CVS 1.12.x through 1.12.8, and 1.11.x through 1.11.16, does not properly handle empty data lines, which may allow remote attackers to perform an "out-of-bounds" write for a single byte to execute arbitrary code or modify critical program data.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2004-0418" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2004-08-06T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "serve_notify in CVS 1.12.x through 1.12.8, and 1.11.x through 1.11.16, does not properly handle empty data lines, which may allow remote attackers to perform an \"out-of-bounds\" write for a single byte to execute arbitrary code or modify critical program data.", "id": "GHSA-fv5v-25hp-gmw7", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:13:01Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:13:01Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0418" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1003" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11242" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-June/022441.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=108716553923643\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/092004.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200406-06.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-519" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:058" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-233.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.