GHSA-FVF9-H9QR-4MR9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:22 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:22
VLAI?
Details

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Errors.gsl in Imatix Xitami 2.5b4 and 2.5b5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) Javascript events, as demonstrated via an onerror event in an IMG SRC tag or (2) User-Agent field in an HTTP GET request.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-1965"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Errors.gsl in Imatix Xitami 2.5b4 and 2.5b5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) Javascript events, as demonstrated via an onerror event in an IMG SRC tag or (2) User-Agent field in an HTTP GET request.",
  "id": "GHSA-fvf9-h9qr-4mr9",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:22:13Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:22:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1965"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/277058"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/279269"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5025"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…