ghsa-fvhq-wrc7-3phf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:03
Modified
2022-05-14 01:03
Details
Adobe Font Driver in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) web site or (2) file, aka "Adobe Font Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0088, CVE-2015-0090, CVE-2015-0092, and CVE-2015-0093.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2015-0091", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-94", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2015-03-11T10:59:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Adobe Font Driver in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) web site or (2) file, aka \"Adobe Font Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability,\" a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0088, CVE-2015-0090, CVE-2015-0092, and CVE-2015-0093.", id: "GHSA-fvhq-wrc7-3phf", modified: "2022-05-14T01:03:08Z", published: "2022-05-14T01:03:08Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0091", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2015/ms15-021", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72905", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031889", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.