GHSA-FVVM-949W-QJ4W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-20 15:30 – Updated: 2026-05-20 15:30
VLAI
Summary
RTK improperly trusts project-local filter configuration, allowing silent tampering of command output shown to LLM
Details
RTK (Rust Token Killer) improperly trusts project-local configuration files. In versions prior to 0.32.0, RTK automatically loads .rtk/filters.toml from the working directory with highest priority and without user notification. An attacker can place a malicious filter file in a repository to apply regex-based modifications (e.g., strip_lines_matching) to shell command output before it is shown to the LLM, without any indication that the output has been modified.
This allows attackers to selectively suppress or alter command output (including file contents, diffs, and security scan results) without detection, potentially concealing malicious code during AI-assisted development or review.
Patch
Fixed in v0.32.0 (PRs #623, #625):
.rtk/filters.tomlis now blocked by default when untrusted, with a visible warning:[rtk] WARNING: untrusted project filters — Filters NOT applied. Run rtk trust to review and enable.- SHA-256 hash verification: if the file changes after trust, filters are blocked again until re-reviewed.
- New
rtk trust/rtk untrustcommands for explicit user consent. - Trust store implemented in
src/trust.rs; trust gate added insrc/toml_filter.rs.
Severity
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "rtk"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.32.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-45792"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-345",
"CWE-426"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-20T15:30:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "RTK (Rust Token Killer) improperly trusts project-local configuration files. In versions prior to 0.32.0, RTK automatically loads `.rtk/filters.toml` from the working directory with highest priority and without user notification. An attacker can place a malicious filter file in a repository to apply regex-based modifications (e.g., `strip_lines_matching`) to shell command output before it is shown to the LLM, without any indication that the output has been modified.\n\nThis allows attackers to selectively suppress or alter command output (including file contents, diffs, and security scan results) without detection, potentially concealing malicious code during AI-assisted development or review.\n\n### Patch\n\nFixed in v0.32.0 (PRs #623, #625):\n\n- `.rtk/filters.toml` is now blocked by default when untrusted, with a visible warning: `[rtk] WARNING: untrusted project filters \u2014 Filters NOT applied. Run rtk trust to review and enable.`\n- SHA-256 hash verification: if the file changes after trust, filters are blocked again until re-reviewed.\n- New `rtk trust` / `rtk untrust` commands for explicit user consent.\n- Trust store implemented in `src/trust.rs`; trust gate added in `src/toml_filter.rs`.",
"id": "GHSA-fvvm-949w-qj4w",
"modified": "2026-05-20T15:30:04Z",
"published": "2026-05-20T15:30:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/security/advisories/GHSA-fvvm-949w-qj4w"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/623"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/625"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "RTK improperly trusts project-local filter configuration, allowing silent tampering of command output shown to LLM"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…