GHSA-FWQ5-VG2M-5CR5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-21 18:31 – Updated: 2025-09-25 18:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace
When received corrupted snap trace we don't know what exactly has happened in MDS side. And we shouldn't continue IOs and metadatas access to MDS, which may corrupt or get incorrect contents.
This patch will just block all the further IO/MDS requests immediately and then evict the kclient itself.
The reason why we still need to evict the kclient just after blocking all the further IOs is that the MDS could revoke the caps faster.
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52732"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-21T16:15:13Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace\n\nWhen received corrupted snap trace we don\u0027t know what exactly has\nhappened in MDS side. And we shouldn\u0027t continue IOs and metadatas\naccess to MDS, which may corrupt or get incorrect contents.\n\nThis patch will just block all the further IO/MDS requests\nimmediately and then evict the kclient itself.\n\nThe reason why we still need to evict the kclient just after\nblocking all the further IOs is that the MDS could revoke the caps\nfaster.",
"id": "GHSA-fwq5-vg2m-5cr5",
"modified": "2025-09-25T18:30:28Z",
"published": "2024-05-21T18:31:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/66ec619e4591f8350f99c5269a7ce160cccc7a7c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a68e564adcaa69b0930809fb64d9d5f7d9c32ba9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…