GHSA-FXJ2-7CF3-5HCM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:20 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:20
VLAI?
Details
Multiple SSH2 servers and clients do not properly handle large packets or large fields, which may allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via buffer overflow attacks, as demonstrated by the SSHredder SSH protocol test suite.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2002-1359"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2002-12-23T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple SSH2 servers and clients do not properly handle large packets or large fields, which may allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via buffer overflow attacks, as demonstrated by the SSHredder SSH protocol test suite.",
"id": "GHSA-fxj2-7cf3-5hcm",
"modified": "2022-04-30T18:20:59Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T18:20:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1359"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10870"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2002-q4/0110.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1005812"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1005813"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-36.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6407"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…