GHSA-G23P-47J7-W4HW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:45 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:45
VLAI?
Details
Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 1.3.x before 1.3.3 and 2.x before 2.2.1, when using PKIX trust validation, does not properly handle a '\0' character in the subject or subjectAltName fields of a certificate, which allows remote man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-3475"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-09-29T23:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 1.3.x before 1.3.3 and 2.x before 2.2.1, when using PKIX trust validation, does not properly handle a \u0027\\0\u0027 character in the subject or subjectAltName fields of a certificate, which allows remote man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.",
"id": "GHSA-g23p-47j7-w4hw",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:45:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:45:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3475"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36855"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36861"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36876"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/secadv/secadv_20090817.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1895"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1896"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…