GHSA-G275-M9XC-X5Q2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-22 18:30 – Updated: 2026-08-25 06:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sctp: keep chunk->transport in step with the list it is queued on

__sctp_outq_flush_rtx() moves a gap-acked chunk onto another transport's transmitted list without updating chunk->transport:

if (chunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
    list_move_tail(&chunk->transmitted_list,
               &transport->transmitted);
    continue;
}

The chunk then sits on a live transport's list while chunk->transport still names a different one. If that transport is removed - sctp_assoc_rm_peer() from an ASCONF Delete-IP - sctp_transport_free() RCU-frees it and the chunk is left with a dangling pointer. sctp_assoc_rm_peer() scrubs peer->transmitted and asoc->outqueue.out_chunk_list, but the chunk is on neither.

The pointer is not followed while tsn_gap_acked is set. A SACK that reneges on the TSN clears the flag, and the next SACK reaches

tchunk->transport->flight_size -= sctp_data_size(tchunk);

inside the freed transport. KASAN reports a slab-use-after-free read in sctp_check_transmitted(), freed from sctp_assoc_rm_peer(). Both the removal and the SACKs come from the association peer.

Set chunk->transport at the move. The ordinary resend path needs nothing: it reaches its list_move_tail() only after sctp_packet_append_chunk() returned SCTP_XMIT_OK, and __sctp_packet_append_chunk() has rebound the chunk by then.

Discovered by XBOW, triaged by Baul Lee baul.lee@xbow.com

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-74588"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-22T16:16:30Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsctp: keep chunk-\u003etransport in step with the list it is queued on\n\n__sctp_outq_flush_rtx() moves a gap-acked chunk onto another transport\u0027s\ntransmitted list without updating chunk-\u003etransport:\n\n\tif (chunk-\u003etsn_gap_acked) {\n\t\tlist_move_tail(\u0026chunk-\u003etransmitted_list,\n\t\t\t       \u0026transport-\u003etransmitted);\n\t\tcontinue;\n\t}\n\nThe chunk then sits on a live transport\u0027s list while chunk-\u003etransport still\nnames a different one.  If that transport is removed - sctp_assoc_rm_peer()\nfrom an ASCONF Delete-IP - sctp_transport_free() RCU-frees it and the chunk\nis left with a dangling pointer.  sctp_assoc_rm_peer() scrubs\npeer-\u003etransmitted and asoc-\u003eoutqueue.out_chunk_list, but the chunk is on\nneither.\n\nThe pointer is not followed while tsn_gap_acked is set.  A SACK that\nreneges on the TSN clears the flag, and the next SACK reaches\n\n\ttchunk-\u003etransport-\u003eflight_size -= sctp_data_size(tchunk);\n\ninside the freed transport.  KASAN reports a slab-use-after-free read in\nsctp_check_transmitted(), freed from sctp_assoc_rm_peer().  Both the\nremoval and the SACKs come from the association peer.\n\nSet chunk-\u003etransport at the move.  The ordinary resend path needs nothing:\nit reaches its list_move_tail() only after sctp_packet_append_chunk()\nreturned SCTP_XMIT_OK, and __sctp_packet_append_chunk() has rebound the\nchunk by then.\n\nDiscovered by XBOW, triaged by Baul Lee \u003cbaul.lee@xbow.com\u003e",
  "id": "GHSA-g275-m9xc-x5q2",
  "modified": "2026-08-25T06:31:21Z",
  "published": "2026-08-22T18:30:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74588"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1adf929121e13e0b19200bb9fef715b918d483fe"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b3b5eec8b2c30ee237e3c31a6a38de9c39d804d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5ccf35ef0ed6059cdf8b1f4606a6584d5b67166b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6575fb17230814b48b471727c8410c0aadff9274"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b9e2ea2057113f3393990ba646d2d97c719a80d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/874a7c2b5e184f06134fdfde27e9ce9271bafe58"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f2cf069a9a72a2d6b97ca8b4c70e714aac99749"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2e7c1de0e226ca1b7fea2de57a6c9bca408709b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…