ghsa-g395-wpqc-cmpv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:32
Modified
2022-05-13 01:32
Details

While handling a particular type of malformed packet BIND erroneously selects a SERVFAIL rcode instead of a FORMERR rcode. If the receiving view has the SERVFAIL cache feature enabled, this can trigger an assertion failure in badcache.c when the request doesn't contain all of the expected information. Affects BIND 9.10.5-S1 to 9.10.5-S4, 9.10.6-S1, 9.10.6-S2.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-5734"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-617"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-01-16T20:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "While handling a particular type of malformed packet BIND erroneously selects a SERVFAIL rcode instead of a FORMERR rcode. If the receiving view has the SERVFAIL cache feature enabled, this can trigger an assertion failure in badcache.c when the request doesn\u0027t contain all of the expected information. Affects BIND 9.10.5-S1 to 9.10.5-S4, 9.10.6-S1, 9.10.6-S2.",
  "id": "GHSA-g395-wpqc-cmpv",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:32:04Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:32:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5734"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01562"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180926-0005"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103189"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040438"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.