ghsa-g4fx-7rrq-8736
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:15
Modified
2022-05-03 03:15
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in the libMagick component of ImageMagick 6.0.6.2 might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via an image index array that triggers the overflow during filename glob expansion by the ExpandFilenames function.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-2440"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-05-18T10:02:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the libMagick component of ImageMagick 6.0.6.2 might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via an image index array that triggers the overflow during filename glob expansion by the ExpandFilenames function.",
  "id": "GHSA-g4fx-7rrq-8736",
  "modified": "2022-05-03T03:15:56Z",
  "published": "2022-05-03T03:15:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2440"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9481"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345595"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21719"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24186"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24284"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1168"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-0015.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.