GHSA-G4G7-53J7-GXQ9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-11 00:32 – Updated: 2025-02-07 21:31An Unchecked Return Value vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows a logically adjacent, unauthenticated attacker sending a specific PIM packet to cause rpd to crash and restart, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS), when PIM is configured with Multicast-only Fast Reroute (MoFRR). Continued receipt and processing of this packet may create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.
This issue is observed on Junos and Junos Evolved platforms where PIM is configured along with MoFRR. MoFRR tries to select the active path, but due to an internal timing issue, rpd is unable to select the forwarding next-hop towards the source, resulting in an rpd crash.
This issue affects:
Junos OS:
- All versions before 20.4R3-S10,
- from 21.2 before 21.2R3-S7,
- from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S6,
- from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S5,
- from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3,
- from 22.3 before 22.3R3,
- from 22.4 before 22.4R2;
Junos OS Evolved:
- All versions before 20.4R3-S10 -EVO,
- from 21.2-EVO before 21.2R3-S7 -EVO,
- from 21.4-EVO before 21.4R3-S6 -EVO,
- from 22.1-EVO before 22.1R3-S5 -EVO,
- from 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S3-EVO,
- from 22.3-EVO before 22.3R3-EVO,
- from 22.4-EVO before 22.4R2-EVO.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-39558"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-252"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-10T23:15:12Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An Unchecked Return Value vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows a logically adjacent, unauthenticated attacker sending a specific PIM packet to cause rpd to crash and restart, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS), when PIM is configured with Multicast-only Fast Reroute (MoFRR). Continued receipt and processing of this packet may create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.\n\nThis issue is observed on Junos and Junos Evolved platforms where PIM is configured along with MoFRR. MoFRR tries to select the active path, but due to an internal timing issue, rpd is unable to select the forwarding next-hop towards the source, resulting in an rpd crash.\n\nThis issue affects:\n\nJunos OS: \n\n\n * All versions before 20.4R3-S10, \n * from 21.2 before 21.2R3-S7, \n * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S6, \n * from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S5, \n * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3, \n * from 22.3 before 22.3R3, \n * from 22.4 before 22.4R2;\u00a0\n\n\n\n\nJunos OS Evolved: \n\n\n * All versions before 20.4R3-S10 -EVO,\n * from 21.2-EVO before 21.2R3-S7 -EVO,\n * from 21.4-EVO before 21.4R3-S6 -EVO,\n * from 22.1-EVO before 22.1R3-S5 -EVO,\n * from 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S3-EVO,\n * from 22.3-EVO before 22.3R3-EVO,\n * from 22.4-EVO before 22.4R2-EVO.",
"id": "GHSA-g4g7-53j7-gxq9",
"modified": "2025-02-07T21:31:00Z",
"published": "2024-07-11T00:32:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39558"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA83018"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:A/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.