ghsa-g4rj-4w28-44fg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:18
Modified
2022-05-17 05:18
Details
Oracle Java SE before 7 Update 6, and OpenJDK 7 before 7u6 build 12 and 8 before build 39, computes hash values without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-2739" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-11-28T13:03:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Oracle Java SE before 7 Update 6, and OpenJDK 7 before 7u6 build 12 and 8 before build 39, computes hash values without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table.", "id": "GHSA-g4rj-4w28-44fg", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:18:22Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:18:22Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2739" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750533" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://armoredbarista.blogspot.de/2012/02/investigating-hashdos-issue.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-May/010238.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/903934" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.nruns.com/_downloads/advisory28122011.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2011-003.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/15/12" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/17/1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.