GHSA-G579-PQ4G-X964

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-14 15:32 – Updated: 2026-02-14 15:32
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Fix SVE writes on !SME systems

When SVE is supported but SME is not supported, a ptrace write to the NT_ARM_SVE regset can place the tracee into an invalid state where (non-streaming) SVE register data is stored in FP_STATE_SVE format but TIF_SVE is clear. This can result in a later warning from fpsimd_restore_current_state(), e.g.

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7214 at arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c:383 fpsimd_restore_current_state+0x50c/0x748

When this happens, fpsimd_restore_current_state() will set TIF_SVE, placing the task into the correct state. This occurs before any other check of TIF_SVE can possibly occur, as other checks of TIF_SVE only happen while the FPSIMD/SVE/SME state is live. Thus, aside from the warning, there is no functional issue.

This bug was introduced during rework to error handling in commit:

9f8bf718f2923 ("arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Gracefully handle errors")

... where the setting of TIF_SVE was moved into a block which is only executed when system_supports_sme() is true.

Fix this by removing the system_supports_sme() check. This ensures that TIF_SVE is set for (SVE-formatted) writes to NT_ARM_SVE, at the cost of unconditionally manipulating the tracee's saved svcr value. The manipulation of svcr is benign and inexpensive, and we already do similar elsewhere (e.g. during signal handling), so I don't think it's worth guarding this with system_supports_sme() checks.

Aside from the above, there is no functional change. The 'type' argument to sve_set_common() is only set to ARM64_VEC_SME (in ssve_set())) when system_supports_sme(), so the ARM64_VEC_SME case in the switch statement is still unreachable when !system_supports_sme(). When CONFIG_ARM64_SME=n, the only caller of sve_set_common() is sve_set(), and the compiler can constant-fold for the case where type is ARM64_VEC_SVE, removing the logic for other cases.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23114"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-14T15:16:06Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\narm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Fix SVE writes on !SME systems\n\nWhen SVE is supported but SME is not supported, a ptrace write to the\nNT_ARM_SVE regset can place the tracee into an invalid state where\n(non-streaming) SVE register data is stored in FP_STATE_SVE format but\nTIF_SVE is clear. This can result in a later warning from\nfpsimd_restore_current_state(), e.g.\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7214 at arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c:383 fpsimd_restore_current_state+0x50c/0x748\n\nWhen this happens, fpsimd_restore_current_state() will set TIF_SVE,\nplacing the task into the correct state. This occurs before any other\ncheck of TIF_SVE can possibly occur, as other checks of TIF_SVE only\nhappen while the FPSIMD/SVE/SME state is live. Thus, aside from the\nwarning, there is no functional issue.\n\nThis bug was introduced during rework to error handling in commit:\n\n  9f8bf718f2923 (\"arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Gracefully handle errors\")\n\n... where the setting of TIF_SVE was moved into a block which is only\nexecuted when system_supports_sme() is true.\n\nFix this by removing the system_supports_sme() check. This ensures that\nTIF_SVE is set for (SVE-formatted) writes to NT_ARM_SVE, at the cost of\nunconditionally manipulating the tracee\u0027s saved svcr value. The\nmanipulation of svcr is benign and inexpensive, and we already do\nsimilar elsewhere (e.g. during signal handling), so I don\u0027t think it\u0027s\nworth guarding this with system_supports_sme() checks.\n\nAside from the above, there is no functional change. The \u0027type\u0027 argument\nto sve_set_common() is only set to ARM64_VEC_SME (in ssve_set())) when\nsystem_supports_sme(), so the ARM64_VEC_SME case in the switch statement\nis still unreachable when !system_supports_sme(). When\nCONFIG_ARM64_SME=n, the only caller of sve_set_common() is sve_set(),\nand the compiler can constant-fold for the case where type is\nARM64_VEC_SVE, removing the logic for other cases.",
  "id": "GHSA-g579-pq4g-x964",
  "modified": "2026-02-14T15:32:18Z",
  "published": "2026-02-14T15:32:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23114"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/128a7494a9f15aad60cc6b7e3546bf481ac54a13"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f39984176e7edcaba3432b6c649c6fe93bf2f80"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…