GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-G58F-8H46-HJGV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

lockd, nfsd: RCU-protect nlmsvc_ops dispatch

nlmsvc_ops is published by nfsd_lockd_init() and cleared by nfsd_lockd_shutdown() with plain stores, while lockd dereferences it unguarded from dispatch sites in fs/lockd/svcsubs.c. The pointer targets nfsd's .rodata and the fopen/fclose callbacks live in nfsd's .text, so a stale load after rmmod nfsd results in either a NULL deref or a module-text use-after-free.

Declare nlmsvc_ops as __rcu, publish via rcu_assign_pointer(), clear via RCU_INIT_POINTER() + synchronize_rcu(). Add a struct module *owner field to nlmsvc_binding and pin the module across indirect calls with try_module_get/module_put. When the binding is torn down, fall back to fput() to avoid leaking struct file references.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89709"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:58Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlockd, nfsd: RCU-protect nlmsvc_ops dispatch\n\nnlmsvc_ops is published by nfsd_lockd_init() and cleared by\nnfsd_lockd_shutdown() with plain stores, while lockd dereferences\nit unguarded from dispatch sites in fs/lockd/svcsubs.c. The pointer\ntargets nfsd\u0027s .rodata and the fopen/fclose callbacks live in nfsd\u0027s\n.text, so a stale load after rmmod nfsd results in either a NULL\nderef or a module-text use-after-free.\n\nDeclare nlmsvc_ops as __rcu, publish via rcu_assign_pointer(), clear\nvia RCU_INIT_POINTER() + synchronize_rcu(). Add a struct module\n*owner field to nlmsvc_binding and pin the module across indirect\ncalls with try_module_get/module_put. When the binding is torn down,\nfall back to fput() to avoid leaking struct file references.",
  "id": "GHSA-g58f-8h46-hjgv",
  "modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:28Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89709"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c461a1820088fb5889d73a6522369bde45527a9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/641e5e20852359b8c31149be4598884e30652f60"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…