GHSA-G59Q-3PWP-9GCX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-19 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix boundary check in mxt_prepare_cfg_mem

When a configuration file provides an object size that is larger than the driver's known mxt_obj_size(object), the driver intends to discard the extra bytes.

The loop iterates using for (i = 0; i < size; i++). Inside the loop, the condition to skip processing extra bytes is:

if (i > mxt_obj_size(object))
    continue;

Since i is a 0-based index, the valid indices for the object are 0 through mxt_obj_size(object) - 1.

When i == mxt_obj_size(object), the condition evaluates to false, and the code processes the byte instead of discarding it.

This causes the code to calculate byte_offset = reg + i - cfg->start_ofs and writes the byte there, overwriting exactly one byte of the adjacent instance or object.

Update the boundary check to skip extra bytes correctly by using >=.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-63908"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:08Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nInput: atmel_mxt_ts - fix boundary check in mxt_prepare_cfg_mem\n\nWhen a configuration file provides an object size that is larger than the\ndriver\u0027s known mxt_obj_size(object), the driver intends to discard the\nextra bytes.\n\nThe loop iterates using for (i = 0; i \u003c size; i++). Inside the loop, the\ncondition to skip processing extra bytes is:\n\n    if (i \u003e mxt_obj_size(object))\n        continue;\n\nSince i is a 0-based index, the valid indices for the object are 0 through\nmxt_obj_size(object) - 1.\n\nWhen i == mxt_obj_size(object), the condition evaluates to false, and the\ncode processes the byte instead of discarding it.\n\nThis causes the code to calculate byte_offset = reg + i - cfg-\u003estart_ofs\nand writes the byte there, overwriting exactly one byte of the adjacent\ninstance or object.\n\nUpdate the boundary check to skip extra bytes correctly by using \u003e=.",
  "id": "GHSA-g59q-3pwp-9gcx",
  "modified": "2026-07-19T18:31:45Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T18:31:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63908"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1017e1c6c6c49cccbcda9bbcfa49e50b0b6dad39"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c3681c3abc35cfac6b702251382312c60d96bc2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6c6b989b4ebf22b086fdfcac2163b5cb55e34d8f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f95f4792c0dc767fcb8e405391e779ab419d55a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/862a1a32b5190241fce7a7d20229539a3926f31e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae92e334544263a02d9f99e18385e718c44392c9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/baa0210fb6a9dc3882509a9411b6d284d88fe30e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e9b62996ba537774f68fecfd7eecb5aec1713952"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…