GHSA-G6XF-XQ8F-56F4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:26 – Updated: 2024-09-13 18:31
VLAI?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadexponentialfunc function in mupdf/pdf_function.c in MuPDF in the mupdf-20090223-win32 package, as used in SumatraPDF 0.9.3 and earlier, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Severity ?
5.4 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-1605"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-05-11T20:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadexponentialfunc function in mupdf/pdf_function.c in MuPDF in the mupdf-20090223-win32 package, as used in SumatraPDF 0.9.3 and earlier, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.",
"id": "GHSA-g6xf-xq8f-56f4",
"modified": "2024-09-13T18:31:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:26:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1605"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690555"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cgit.ghostscript.com/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/mupdf.git/commit/?id=451373e028f82fa2f1cc2a6a669df31d85c877bd"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2009-04/0258.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1185"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1186"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…