GHSA-G8F8-5M52-5P35

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:39 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:39
VLAI?
Details

The CSecurityTLS::processMsg function in common/rfb/CSecurityTLS.cxx in the vncviewer component in TigerVNC 1.1beta1 does not properly verify the server's X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof a TLS VNC server via an arbitrary certificate.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-1775"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-05-26T18:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The CSecurityTLS::processMsg function in common/rfb/CSecurityTLS.cxx in the vncviewer component in TigerVNC 1.1beta1 does not properly verify the server\u0027s X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof a TLS VNC server via an arbitrary certificate.",
  "id": "GHSA-g8f8-5m52-5p35",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:39:44Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:39:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1775"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702470"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702672"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-May/060567.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/05/06/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/05/09/7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/44939"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg01342.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg01345.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg01347.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01342.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01345.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01347.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0871.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47738"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…