ghsa-g8h3-hp92-c5qx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:27
Modified
2022-05-24 17:27
Details
GnuPG 2.2.21 and 2.2.22 (and Gpg4win 3.1.12) has an array overflow, leading to a crash or possibly unspecified other impact, when a victim imports an attacker's OpenPGP key, and this key has AEAD preferences. The overflow is caused by a g10/key-check.c error. NOTE: GnuPG 2.3.x is unaffected. GnuPG 2.2.23 is a fixed version.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2020-25125", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2020-09-03T18:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "GnuPG 2.2.21 and 2.2.22 (and Gpg4win 3.1.12) has an array overflow, leading to a crash or possibly unspecified other impact, when a victim imports an attacker's OpenPGP key, and this key has AEAD preferences. The overflow is caused by a g10/key-check.c error. NOTE: GnuPG 2.3.x is unaffected. GnuPG 2.2.23 is a fixed version.", id: "GHSA-g8h3-hp92-c5qx", modified: "2022-05-24T17:27:22Z", published: "2022-05-24T17:27:22Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-25125", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176034", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://dev.gnupg.org/T5050", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://dev.gnupg.org/rG8ec9573e57866dda5efb4677d4454161517484bc", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2020q3/000448.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/03/4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/03/5", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.