ghsa-g9gh-84qj-827r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:29
Modified
2022-05-17 01:29
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in paintlib, as used in Trimble SketchUp (formerly Google SketchUp) before 2013 (13.0.3689), allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted RLE4-compressed bitmap (BMP). NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2013-3664 due to different affected products and codebases (ADT1).

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-7388"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-07-01T17:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in paintlib, as used in Trimble SketchUp (formerly Google SketchUp) before 2013 (13.0.3689), allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted RLE4-compressed bitmap (BMP).  NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2013-3664 due to different affected products and codebases (ADT1).",
  "id": "GHSA-g9gh-84qj-827r",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:29:12Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:29:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7388"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/84723"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://blog.binamuse.com/2013/05/multiple-vulnerabilities-on-sketchup.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/53635"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.binamuse.com/advisories/BINA-20130521B.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/60248"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.