ghsa-g9rv-5pxc-p5wm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:59
Modified
2022-05-01 06:59
Details
Integer overflow in CGI scripts in Nagios 1.x before 1.4.1 and 2.x before 2.3.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a content length (Content-Length) HTTP header. NOTE: this is a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-2162.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-2489" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-05-19T23:02:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer overflow in CGI scripts in Nagios 1.x before 1.4.1 and 2.x before 2.3.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a content length (Content-Length) HTTP header. NOTE: this is a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-2162.", "id": "GHSA-g9rv-5pxc-p5wm", "modified": "2022-05-01T06:59:35Z", "published": "2022-05-01T06:59:35Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2489" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26454" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/287-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20123" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20247" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20313" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1072" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200605-07.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.nagios.org/development/changelog.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18059" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1822" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.