GHSA-GC56-W3PR-7W7F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-18 09:30 – Updated: 2025-10-18 09:30
VLAI?
Details
The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cache Poisoning in all versions up to, and including, 9.0.48. This is due to the plugin not serving cached data from server-side responses and instead relying on user-input. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to poison the cache location for location search results.
Severity ?
5.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-11703"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-349"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-18T07:15:35Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cache Poisoning in all versions up to, and including, 9.0.48. This is due to the plugin not serving cached data from server-side responses and instead relying on user-input. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to poison the cache location for location search results.",
"id": "GHSA-gc56-w3pr-7w7f",
"modified": "2025-10-18T09:30:51Z",
"published": "2025-10-18T09:30:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11703"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/CodeCabin/wp-google-maps/pull/1087/files"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3378871%40wp-google-maps\u0026new=3378871%40wp-google-maps\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://research.cleantalk.org/cve-2025-11703"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/531360c6-e78a-4344-be06-95735337a2d6?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…