ghsa-gc7q-jgjv-vjr2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-09-17 22:29
Modified
2024-09-17 22:29
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
6.9 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
6.9 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
Keycloak Services has a potential bypass of brute force protection
Details
If an attacker launches many login attempts in parallel then the attacker can have more guesses at a password than the brute force protection configuration permits. This is due to the brute force check occurring before the brute force protector has locked the user.
Acknowledgements: Special thanks to Maurizio Agazzini for reporting this issue and helping us improve our project.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.keycloak:keycloak-services", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "22.0.12", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.keycloak:keycloak-services", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "23.0.0", }, { fixed: "24.0.7", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.keycloak:keycloak-services", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "25.0.0", }, { fixed: "25.0.4", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-4629", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-307", "CWE-837", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2024-09-17T22:29:01Z", nvd_published_at: null, severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "If an attacker launches many login attempts in parallel then the attacker can have more guesses at a password than the brute force protection configuration permits. This is due to the brute force check occurring before the brute force protector has locked the user.\n\n**Acknowledgements:**\nSpecial thanks to Maurizio Agazzini for reporting this issue and helping us improve our project.", id: "GHSA-gc7q-jgjv-vjr2", modified: "2024-09-17T22:29:01Z", published: "2024-09-17T22:29:01Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/security/advisories/GHSA-gc7q-jgjv-vjr2", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4629", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/d78b3072ffffbff3954bf9f3181e3daf8e93c1ab", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/c8053dd812d9b9f05b293f901b9dc39e061ebb88", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/b25c28458a562abda2f84fc684e59cce8577e562", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/99f92ad5fff5555d53930c2d32f8be3e08c514c1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/461fa631dc55b9739c9ed8c49de9f5b213955200", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/2fb358e1a21c5387cdc11100ce3562b4dcfe5416", }, { type: "PACKAGE", url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276761", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-4629", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6501", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6500", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6499", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6497", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6495", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6494", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6493", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, { score: "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N", type: "CVSS_V4", }, ], summary: "Keycloak Services has a potential bypass of brute force protection", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.