ghsa-gc7q-jgjv-vjr2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-09-17 22:29
Modified
2024-09-17 22:29
Summary
Keycloak Services has a potential bypass of brute force protection
Details

If an attacker launches many login attempts in parallel then the attacker can have more guesses at a password than the brute force protection configuration permits. This is due to the brute force check occurring before the brute force protector has locked the user.

Acknowledgements: Special thanks to Maurizio Agazzini for reporting this issue and helping us improve our project.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "org.keycloak:keycloak-services",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "22.0.12",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "org.keycloak:keycloak-services",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "23.0.0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "24.0.7",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "org.keycloak:keycloak-services",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "25.0.0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "25.0.4",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2024-4629",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-307",
         "CWE-837",
      ],
      github_reviewed: true,
      github_reviewed_at: "2024-09-17T22:29:01Z",
      nvd_published_at: null,
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "If an attacker launches many login attempts in parallel then the attacker can have more guesses at a password than the brute force protection configuration permits. This is due to the brute force check occurring before the brute force protector has locked the user.\n\n**Acknowledgements:**\nSpecial thanks to Maurizio Agazzini for reporting this issue and helping us improve our project.",
   id: "GHSA-gc7q-jgjv-vjr2",
   modified: "2024-09-17T22:29:01Z",
   published: "2024-09-17T22:29:01Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/security/advisories/GHSA-gc7q-jgjv-vjr2",
      },
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4629",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/d78b3072ffffbff3954bf9f3181e3daf8e93c1ab",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/c8053dd812d9b9f05b293f901b9dc39e061ebb88",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/b25c28458a562abda2f84fc684e59cce8577e562",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/99f92ad5fff5555d53930c2d32f8be3e08c514c1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/461fa631dc55b9739c9ed8c49de9f5b213955200",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/2fb358e1a21c5387cdc11100ce3562b4dcfe5416",
      },
      {
         type: "PACKAGE",
         url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276761",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-4629",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6501",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6500",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6499",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6497",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6495",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6494",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6493",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
      {
         score: "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
         type: "CVSS_V4",
      },
   ],
   summary: "Keycloak Services has a potential bypass of brute force protection",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.