GHSA-GCH3-H386-3492
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smb: client: restore the data_offset bound in is_valid_oplock_break()
Commit 83bfbd0bb902 ("cifs: Remove the RFC1002 header from smb_hdr") changed the quantity this bound is measured against. It used to be srv->total_read minus the 4-byte RFC1002 preamble that total_read then included, so it was the SMB message length. The same commit stopped counting the preamble, and the mechanical substitution to srv->total_read - srv->pdu_size left an expression that is identically zero: standard_receive3() reads MID_HEADER_SIZE() bytes and then exactly pdu_length - MID_HEADER_SIZE() more, adding both to total_read.
len is therefore 0, the subtraction below it wraps, and no __u32 DataOffset can exceed the result, so the check from commit 097f5863b1a0 ("cifs: read overflow in is_valid_oplock_break()") no longer rejects anything. Use total_read, which is now the message length on its own.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-89630"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:48Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmb: client: restore the data_offset bound in is_valid_oplock_break()\n\nCommit 83bfbd0bb902 (\"cifs: Remove the RFC1002 header from smb_hdr\")\nchanged the quantity this bound is measured against. It used to be\nsrv-\u003etotal_read minus the 4-byte RFC1002 preamble that total_read then\nincluded, so it was the SMB message length. The same commit stopped\ncounting the preamble, and the mechanical substitution to\nsrv-\u003etotal_read - srv-\u003epdu_size left an expression that is identically\nzero: standard_receive3() reads MID_HEADER_SIZE() bytes and then exactly\npdu_length - MID_HEADER_SIZE() more, adding both to total_read.\n\nlen is therefore 0, the subtraction below it wraps, and no __u32\nDataOffset can exceed the result, so the check from commit 097f5863b1a0\n(\"cifs: read overflow in is_valid_oplock_break()\") no longer rejects\nanything. Use total_read, which is now the message length on its own.",
"id": "GHSA-gch3-h386-3492",
"modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:25Z",
"published": "2026-09-11T21:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89630"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b16a1967a01ad4496a7206a87c3eb16f1df2b05"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba22f575de9deeae4ae0859ca4315a7698226237"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.