GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-GCH3-H386-3492

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smb: client: restore the data_offset bound in is_valid_oplock_break()

Commit 83bfbd0bb902 ("cifs: Remove the RFC1002 header from smb_hdr") changed the quantity this bound is measured against. It used to be srv->total_read minus the 4-byte RFC1002 preamble that total_read then included, so it was the SMB message length. The same commit stopped counting the preamble, and the mechanical substitution to srv->total_read - srv->pdu_size left an expression that is identically zero: standard_receive3() reads MID_HEADER_SIZE() bytes and then exactly pdu_length - MID_HEADER_SIZE() more, adding both to total_read.

len is therefore 0, the subtraction below it wraps, and no __u32 DataOffset can exceed the result, so the check from commit 097f5863b1a0 ("cifs: read overflow in is_valid_oplock_break()") no longer rejects anything. Use total_read, which is now the message length on its own.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89630"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:48Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmb: client: restore the data_offset bound in is_valid_oplock_break()\n\nCommit 83bfbd0bb902 (\"cifs: Remove the RFC1002 header from smb_hdr\")\nchanged the quantity this bound is measured against.  It used to be\nsrv-\u003etotal_read minus the 4-byte RFC1002 preamble that total_read then\nincluded, so it was the SMB message length.  The same commit stopped\ncounting the preamble, and the mechanical substitution to\nsrv-\u003etotal_read - srv-\u003epdu_size left an expression that is identically\nzero: standard_receive3() reads MID_HEADER_SIZE() bytes and then exactly\npdu_length - MID_HEADER_SIZE() more, adding both to total_read.\n\nlen is therefore 0, the subtraction below it wraps, and no __u32\nDataOffset can exceed the result, so the check from commit 097f5863b1a0\n(\"cifs: read overflow in is_valid_oplock_break()\") no longer rejects\nanything.  Use total_read, which is now the message length on its own.",
  "id": "GHSA-gch3-h386-3492",
  "modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:25Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89630"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b16a1967a01ad4496a7206a87c3eb16f1df2b05"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba22f575de9deeae4ae0859ca4315a7698226237"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…