GHSA-GCW7-GP3X-GX2J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:50 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:50
VLAI?
Details

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in CyberLink Power2Go 7 (build 196) and 8 (build 1031) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the (1) src and (2) name parameters in a p2g project file.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-5171"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-09-15T17:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in CyberLink Power2Go 7 (build 196) and 8 (build 1031) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the (1) src and (2) name parameters in a p2g project file.",
  "id": "GHSA-gcw7-gp3x-gx2j",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:50:50Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:50:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-5171"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/71723"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/77600"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47145"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/18220"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/158003"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…