GHSA-GFX7-7VXH-F4G8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:25 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:53
VLAI?
Details
driver/subprocs.c in XScreenSaver before 5.34 does not properly perform an internal consistency check, which allows physically proximate attackers to bypass the lock screen by hot swapping monitors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-8025"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-11-10T17:59:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "driver/subprocs.c in XScreenSaver before 5.34 does not properly perform an internal consistency check, which allows physically proximate attackers to bypass the lock screen by hot swapping monitors.",
"id": "GHSA-gfx7-7vxh-f4g8",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:53:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:25:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8025"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Thaolia/status/656823859304398848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jwz.org/blog/2015/10/xscreensaver-5-34"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-11/msg00102.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3438"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/24/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/25/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/29/12"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034052"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2789-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…