ghsa-ggm6-m8r4-r7vh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:27
Modified
2022-04-29 01:27
Details
Microsoft Word 97, 98(J), 2000, and 2002, and Microsoft Works Suites 2001 through 2004, do not properly check the length of the "Macro names" data value, which could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a buffer overflow attack.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2003-0820" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2003-12-15T05:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Microsoft Word 97, 98(J), 2000, and 2002, and Microsoft Works Suites 2001 through 2004, do not properly check the length of the \"Macro names\" data value, which could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a buffer overflow attack.", "id": "GHSA-ggm6-m8r4-r7vh", "modified": "2022-04-29T01:27:02Z", "published": "2022-04-29T01:27:02Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0820" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2003/ms03-050" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/13682" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A336" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A585" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A586" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A668" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2003-10/0163.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.security.nnov.ru/search/document.asp?docid=5243" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8835" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.