GHSA-GH4G-3GM9-5WRQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2019-05-29 18:38 – Updated: 2021-08-04 16:06
VLAI?
Summary
Cross-Site Scripting in shave
Details
Versions of shave prior to 2.5.3 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting. The shave package overwrites HTML elements and in doing so fails to properly encode the output. If encoded HTML input is passed into shave the output will be decoded which may lead to Cross-Site Scripting.
Recommendation
Upgrade to version 2.5.3 or later.
Severity ?
6.1 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "shave"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.5.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-12313"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2019-05-29T18:37:51Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Versions of `shave` prior to 2.5.3 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting. The `shave` package overwrites HTML elements and in doing so fails to properly encode the output. If encoded HTML input is passed into `shave` the output will be decoded which may lead to Cross-Site Scripting.\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nUpgrade to version 2.5.3 or later.",
"id": "GHSA-gh4g-3gm9-5wrq",
"modified": "2021-08-04T16:06:35Z",
"published": "2019-05-29T18:38:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12313"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dollarshaveclub/shave/commit/da7371b0531ba14eae48ef1bb1456a3de4cfa954#diff-074799b511e4b61923dfd3f2a3bf9b54R67"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dollarshaveclub/shave/compare/852b537...da7371b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/822"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Cross-Site Scripting in shave"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…