GHSA-GJ46-MFX7-2VWX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:58 – Updated: 2025-04-12 13:03
VLAI?
Details
The HTTPS protocol does not consider the role of the TCP congestion window in providing information about content length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data by leveraging a web-browser configuration in which third-party cookies are sent, aka a "HEIST" attack.
Severity ?
5.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-7152"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-09-06T10:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The HTTPS protocol does not consider the role of the TCP congestion window in providing information about content length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data by leveraging a web-browser configuration in which third-party cookies are sent, aka a \"HEIST\" attack.",
"id": "GHSA-gj46-mfx7-2vwx",
"modified": "2025-04-12T13:03:47Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:58:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7152"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tom.vg/papers/heist_blackhat2016.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/08/new-attack-steals-ssns-e-mail-addresses-and-more-from-https-pages"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92769"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036741"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036742"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036743"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036744"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036745"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036746"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…