ghsa-gjgx-pwcf-xm7m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:17
Modified
2022-05-01 02:17
Details
Multiple interpretation error in Sophos 3.91 with the 2.28.4 engine allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an "MZ" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a "triple headed" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the "magic byte bug."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-3382" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-10-30T14:34:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Multiple interpretation error in Sophos 3.91 with the 2.28.4 engine allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an \"MZ\" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a \"triple headed\" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the \"magic byte bug.\"", "id": "GHSA-gjgx-pwcf-xm7m", "modified": "2022-05-01T02:17:27Z", "published": "2022-05-01T02:17:27Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3382" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=113026417802703\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyte.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyteadv.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityelf.org/updmagic.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15189" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.