ghsa-gm92-3frh-vrww
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:08
Modified
2022-05-14 01:08
Details
The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.12 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism and cause a denial of service (stack corruption and crash) via a format string that uses positional parameters and many format specifiers.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-3404" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-02-10T18:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.12 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism and cause a denial of service (stack corruption and crash) via a format string that uses positional parameters and many format specifiers.", "id": "GHSA-gm92-3frh-vrww", "modified": "2022-05-14T01:08:01Z", "published": "2022-05-14T01:08:01Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3404" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833703" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-04" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12445" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1098.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1200.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/07/11/17" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1589-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.