GHSA-GM92-3FRH-VRWW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:08 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:08
VLAI?
Details
The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.12 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism and cause a denial of service (stack corruption and crash) via a format string that uses positional parameters and many format specifiers.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-3404"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-02-10T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.12 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism and cause a denial of service (stack corruption and crash) via a format string that uses positional parameters and many format specifiers.",
"id": "GHSA-gm92-3frh-vrww",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:08:01Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:08:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3404"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833703"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-04"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12445"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1098.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1200.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/07/11/17"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1589-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…