ghsa-gmpq-cwfx-xxr2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:14
Modified
2022-05-13 01:14
Severity ?
Details
In the function ReadTXTImage() in coders/txt.c in ImageMagick 7.0.6-10, an integer overflow might occur for the addition operation "GetQuantumRange(depth)+1" when "depth" is large, producing a smaller value than expected. As a result, an infinite loop would occur for a crafted TXT file that claims a very large "max_value" value.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-14173" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-190" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-09-07T06:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the function ReadTXTImage() in coders/txt.c in ImageMagick 7.0.6-10, an integer overflow might occur for the addition operation \"GetQuantumRange(depth)+1\" when \"depth\" is large, producing a smaller value than expected. As a result, an infinite loop would occur for a crafted TXT file that claims a very large \"max_value\" value.", "id": "GHSA-gmpq-cwfx-xxr2", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:14:38Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:14:38Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14173" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/713" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/50f54462076648ac2e36c3f58f4dadd4babbf1c9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00015.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/09/msg00007.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-07" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.